The problem of waste disposal requires a legislative approach, good practices, and innovative solutions. But above all, a fundamental revision of the relevant legislation is needed.
But is it really a trend? No. It’s a necessity. Nowadays, speaking of the circular economy is tantamount to making use of the already available reuse and recycling systems.
The waste problem is a serious issue in today’s world. We have even heard about it during the recent election campaigns. Being able to start a transition to the circular economy model would, therefore, be a strategic move of no small importance.
However, there are currently two major constraints. The first one is linked to the old linear economy, which led to the problem of waste disposal. The result of it is that urban garbage is often disposed of in landfills (with all its negative consequences) because waste recycling plants are still scarce.
The second one concerns the cost of recycling: the British government estimated that the creation of an efficient system for the reuse and recycling of resources would cost about 14 billion euros. You can read more on what expert essay writers say about it by visiting this link.
Governments worldwide are struggling to make a transition to the circular economy because waste disposal is becoming a pressing concern for them. Attempts to resolve it are curbed due to the vague legal definition of “waste”, which is referred to as something “the holder discards or intends or is required to discard.”
On the other hand, the leading companies are aware of the impact the circular economy may have on their competitiveness. There is also a willingness at the local level to move along this road which translates into separate garbage collection, ecological islands (especially in small towns), as well as consortia of public companies.
Local authorities should be encouraged to share the best practices and innovative solutions for the development of sustainable waste management systems and waste reduction. On the other hand, the existing rules and regulations should be revised to overcome the limits of the administrative risks related to recycling. This is necessary to ensure the legal protection of those who decide to go into recycling. For example, recovering glass bottles can turn into a real nightmare for entrepreneurs because they will have to constantly overcome numerous bureaucratic hurdles. At some point, they may even ask themselves,’Is the game really worth the candle?’ Central and local public administration can play an important role in helping entrepreneurs find answers to this type of question.
The political guidelines for the next European Commission put the circular economy on top of the EU political agenda. In December 2015, an ad hoc package promoting a swifter transition to this economic model and outlining actions necessary for the realization of innovative projects was approved.
According to it, adopting the circular economy model can bring a number of tangible benefits: between 1.2 and 3 million new jobs will be created, while the average cost per km will decrease by 75% thanks to car sharing and electric vehicles.
It could also be advantageous to other industries, including furniture production, electrical and electronic waste disposal, and textile manufacturing. However, it will take a revision of national legislation.
The circular economy and green economy are projected to be the two main driving forces behind economic growth in the coming decades. They are both based on the “do not throw anything away but recover it” concept which our grandparents employed when they reused and recycled their everyday items. We should, therefore, not discard these time-tested practices and turn them to our advantage today.